To be honest, from what I know of the "night life," it's really not all it's cracked up to be. Most of the time, the "night life" leads people to do stupid stuff. That's the honest truth. Who really thinks their clearest at 3am? No one. The human body isn't designed to do that. Now, admittedly, there may be some people really good at it. But it just generally isn't natural. Some people would argue the natural case. What exactly is "natural," then? That's the question that stems from that who argument. What is natural supposed to be? It's when something is in the state it was originally intended to be in. So "natural" is not how something starts out, it's how it's supposed to be, otherwise it is in a state opposed to it's natural being.
Now, people can argue that, and I'm sure they would if they read this, but seeing as my readership is not very high, I doubt many people will read it or argue with it. That's fine. Because this was written during an unnatural state, when I was up at 2 in the morning, very tired. I prove my own point, and prove that circular logic and reasoning are as effective at proving points as using a piece of cloth is as effective at sharpening a knife. Confused yet?